FRAND

Jurisdictional Conflicts in SEP / FRAND licensing: China’s approach

China’s Approach OPPO v. Sharp (Supreme People’s Court, August 19, 2021): OPPO sued Sharp to determine global FRAND licensing rates for Sharp’s 3G, 4G, Wi-Fi, and HEVC SEPs, following Sharp’s infringement lawsuits in Japan, Germany, and Taiwan. The SPC upheld the Guangzhou IP Court’s jurisdiction, citing OPPO’s Chinese manufacturing base and the parties’ intent to […]

Jurisdictional Conflicts in SEP / FRAND licensing: China’s approach Read More »

Jurisdictional Conflicts in SEP / FRAND licensing: Brazil’s approach

Brazil’s Approach SEPs and their licensing under FRAND terms have become critical issues in Brazil, a major smartphone market with over 160 million internet users, ranking as the fifth-largest globally. Brazil’s pro-patentee judicial environment has made it a hotspot for SEP enforcement, particularly in telecommunications, where SEPs underpin 2G––5G standards. Brazilian courts, especially in Rio de

Jurisdictional Conflicts in SEP / FRAND licensing: Brazil’s approach Read More »

Jurisdictional Conflicts in SEP / FRAND licensing. Patents vs. Competition

Background  This is a blog series on jurisdictional conflicts in Standard Essential Patents (SEPs) and Fair, Reasonable, and Non-Discriminatory (FRAND) licensing. In this series, we look at how different countries handle these disputes, which often span borders and involve high-stakes in tech. This series is based on a detailed analysis of key cases from 2010 to

Jurisdictional Conflicts in SEP / FRAND licensing. Patents vs. Competition Read More »

AMR-NB-WB

An Analysis of the Chinese Supreme Peoples Court decision in Adavanced Codec Tech. LLC v. Oppo: Case No. (2022) Sup. Court Zhimin Zhong No. 907, 910, 911, 916, 917, 918

Summary:  This post covers the decision of the Supreme People’s Court of China’s decision in the case of Advanced Codec Technologies, LLC v. Guangdong OPPO Mobile Telecommunications Corp., Ltd. (Case Nos. (2022) Zhimin Zhong 907, 910, 911, 916, 917, 918, decided on December 12, 2023) addresses a complex dispute over Fair, Reasonable And Non-Discriminatory (FRAND) terms  for Standard Essential Patents (SEPs).   This case involves six patents related to

An Analysis of the Chinese Supreme Peoples Court decision in Adavanced Codec Tech. LLC v. Oppo: Case No. (2022) Sup. Court Zhimin Zhong No. 907, 910, 911, 916, 917, 918 Read More »

Phone having hedonic regression equation

An Analysis of the Chinese Court decision in Oppo v. Nokia: Case No. (2021) Yu 01 Min Chu No. 1232

Summary:  In July 2023, a Division Bench ofthe Delhi High Court had in the appeal filed by Oppo against Nokia,  held that a single judge could issue pro tem orders mandating security deposits for securing the interests of the patentee during the time the litigation persists.  Oppo appealed to the Supreme Court of India, but the

An Analysis of the Chinese Court decision in Oppo v. Nokia: Case No. (2021) Yu 01 Min Chu No. 1232 Read More »