SEP / /FRAND Related decisions across the globe

 

This posts lists out the number of cases that have been filed across the globe regarding Standard Essential Patents (SEPs).  The different jurisdictions are: 

Delhi High Court; UK High Court (EWHC) Business and Property Courts, Court of Appeal (EWCA);  Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit; Courts in Germany including Munich ; Mannheim, Karlsruhe, State of Rio de Janeiro Judiciary, Supreme People’s Court (China), etc.   Various decisions issued by Competition authorities across the globe are also listed.  

Each of these decisions can be accessed from the Resources Tab on this website on the respective page of each jurisdiction.  For example, if you want to all see decisions from China, relating to SEPs/FRAND, then click on resources and then click on button under China and so on.

JurisdictionDate of JudgmentIssuing AuthorityCitation
United KingdomMay 1, 2025EWCAOptis v Apple [2025] EWCA Civ 552
United KingdomMarch 24, 2025High Court (EWHC) Business and Property CourtsSamsung Electronics Co Ltd & Anor v ZTE Corporation & Ors [2025] EWHC 705 (Pat)
United KingdomMarch 6, 2025Court of Appeal (EWCA)Tesla v InterDigital [2025] EWCA Civ 193
United KingdomFebruary 28, 2025Court of Appeal (EWCA)Lenovo v Ericsson [2025] EWCA Civ 182
IndiaFebruary 20, 2025Delhi High CourtKoninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. v. Maj. (Retd.) Sukesh Behl & Anr and Ors
UPCDecember 18, 2024Munich Local DivisionLocal Division Munich, 18 December 2024, UPC_CFI_9/2023
UPCNovember 22, 2024Mannheim Local DivisionLocal Division Mannheim, 22 November 2024, UPC_CFI_210/2023
United StatesOctober 24, 2024Court of Appeals for the Federal CircuitTelefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson v. Lenovo (U.S.), Inc., No. 24-1515 (Fed. Cir. Oct. 24, 2024)
United KingdomJuly 12, 2024Court of Appeal (EWCA)InterDigital v Lenovo [2024] EWCA Civ 743
IndiaMay 31, 2024Delhi High CourtInterDigital Technology Corporation and Ors, InterDigital VC Holdings Inc and Ors v Guangdong Oppo Mobile Telecommunications Corp. Ltd. and Ors
IndiaMay 31, 2024Delhi High CourtGuandong Oppo Mobile Telecommunications Corp. Ltd. and Ors v InterDigital Technology Corporation and Ors, InterDigital VC Holdings Inc and Ors
United KingdomMay 23, 2024High Court (EWHC) Business and Property CourtsMotorola v Ericsson [2024] EWHC 1267 (Ch)
United KingdomApril 25, 2024High Court (EWHC) Business and Property CourtsLenovo v InterDigital [2024] EWHC 1036 (Pat)
IndiaMarch 28, 2024Delhi High CourtLava International Limited v Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson
BrazilMarch 22, 2024State of Rio de Janeiro Judiciary, Court of JusticeState of Rio de Janeiro Judiciary, Court of Justice, Anticipatory Judicial Protection n. 0126658-32.2021.8.19.0001, Chief Judge: Alexandre de Carvalho Mesquita, Judging Body: 1st Business Court, decided on March 22, 2024
United KingdomMarch 21, 2024High Court (EWHC) Business and Property CourtsLenovo v Interdigital [2024] EWHC 596 (Ch)
United KingdomFebruary 14, 2024High Court (EWHC) Business and Property CourtsOptis v Apple [2024] EWHC 197 (Ch)
BrazilDecember 15, 2023State of Rio de Janeiro Judiciary, Court of JusticeState of Rio de Janeiro Judiciary, Court of Justice, Common Procedure n. 0214224-53.2020.8.19.0001, Judge in Exercise: Elisabete Franco Longobardi, Judging Body: 5th Business Court, decided on December 15, 2023
GermanyDecember 14, 2023Regional Court of MunichRegional Court München, 14.12.2023, 7 O 10988/22 – Verhältnis von Unverhältnismäßigkeits- und Zwangslizenzeinwand in Patentverletzungsstreit
ChinaDecember 12, 2023Supreme People’s CourtAdvanced Codec Technologies, LLC v. Guangdong OPPO Mobile Telecommunications Co., Ltd. (2022) ZGFZMZ Nos. 907, 910, 911, 916, 917, and 918, SPC
GermanyOctober 11, 2023Higher Regional Court of KarlsruheHigher Regional Court Karlsruhe, 11.10.2023, 6 U 204/22 Kart – Standardessentielle Mobilfunknetz-Patente
GermanySeptember 14, 2023Regional Court of MunichRegional Court München, 14.09.2023, 7 O 1971/22 – Erfolgloser Zwangslizenzeinwand bei fehlender marktbeherrschender Stellung
United KingdomSeptember 7, 2023High Court (EWHC) Business and Property CourtsNokia v Oppo [2023] EWHC 2249 (Pat)
IndiaAugust 28, 2023Delhi High CourtAtlas Global Technologies LLC v TP-Link Technologies Co. Ltd
United KingdomJuly 26, 2023High Court (EWHC) Business and Property CourtsNokia v Oppo [2023] EWHC 1912 (Pat)
GermanyJuly 20, 2023Regional Court of MunichRegional Court München, 20.07.2023, 7 O 5416/23 – Einstweiliger Rechtsschutz gegen ein ausländisches Prozessführungsverbot
IndiaJuly 13, 2023Delhi High CourtTelefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson v Competition Commission of India and Another
Republic of KoreaJuly 6, 2023Seoul High Court (서울고등법원)Seoul High Court Decision, 2021Nu61668, dated July 6, 2023
United KingdomJuly 4, 2023High Court (EWHC) Business and Property CourtsInterDigital v Lenovo [2023] EWHC 1583 (Pat)
IndiaJuly 3, 2023Delhi High CourtNokia Technologies OY v Guangdong Oppo Mobile Telecommunications Corp. Ltd. and Ors
United KingdomJune 28, 2023High Court (EWHC) Business and Property CourtsInterDigital v Lenovo [2023] EWHC 1577 (Pat)
GermanyApril 19, 2023Regional Court of MunichRegional Court München, 19.04.2023, 21 O 1910/22 – Fehlende Lizenzwilligkeit bei zögerlichem Verhandeln
GermanyApril 14, 2023Regional Court of MannheimRegional Court Mannheim, 14.04.2023, 7 O 91/22 – Geheimnisschutzanordnung II
Republic of KoreaApril 13, 2023Supreme Court of Korea (대법원)Supreme Court Decision, 2020du31897, dated April 13, 2023
IndiaMarch 29, 2023Delhi High CourtIntex Technologies (India) Ltd v Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson
BrazilFebruary 8, 2023State of Rio de Janeiro Judiciary, Court of JusticeState of Rio de Janeiro Judiciary, Court of Justice, Common Procedure n. 0813303-40.2023.8.19.0001, Judge in Exercise: Alexandre de Carvalho Mesquita, Judging Body: 1st Business Court, decided on February 8, 2023
GermanyJanuary 24, 2023Federal Court of Justice (Bundesgerichtshof)Federal Court of Justice, 24.01.2023, X ZR 123/20 – CQI-Bericht II
ChinaDecember 30, 2022Supreme People’s CourtApple Computer Trading (Shanghai) Co., Ltd. v. China IWNCOMM Co., Ltd. (2022) ZGFZMZ No. 817, SPC
United KingdomOctober 27, 2022Court of Appeal (EWCA)Optis v Apple [2022] EWCA Civ 1411
ChinaSeptember 7, 2022Supreme People’s CourtNokia Corporation et al. v. Guangdong OPPO Mobile Telecommunications Co., Ltd. et al. (2022) ZGFZMXZ No. 167, SPC
United StatesAugust 31, 2022Court of Appeals for the Federal CircuitINVT SPE LLC v. International Trade Commission, 46 F.4th 1361 (Fed. Cir. 2022)
IndiaAugust 18, 2022Delhi High CourtTelefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson v Gionee Communication Equipment Co. Ltd. and ANR
GermanyAugust 5, 2022Regional Court of MunichRegional Court München, 05.08.2022 – 21 O 11522/21 – Unverhältnismäßigkeitseinwand in FRAND-Fällen
United KingdomJuly 11, 2022Court of Appeal (EWCA)Nokia v Oppo [2022] EWCA Civ 947
ChinaJune 30, 2022Supreme People’s CourtXu et al. v. A Road and Bridge Construction Company (2020) ZGFZMZ No. 1696, SPC
United StatesJune 21, 2022Court of Appeals, Fifth CircuitContinental Automotive Systems, Inc. v. Avanci, L.L.C., No. 20-11032 (5th Cir. 2022)
GermanyFebruary 7, 2022Higher Regional Court of DüsseldorfHigher Regional Court Düsseldorf, 07.02.2022, 2 U 25/21
GermanyFebruary 2, 2022Higher Regional Court of KarlsruheHigher Regional Court Karlsruhe, 02.02.2022 – 6 U 149/20 – Steuersignalkanalisierung II
United StatesAugust 31, 2021Court of Appeals, Fifth CircuitHTC Corp. v. Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson, 12 F.4th 476 (5th Cir. 2021)
IndiaMay 3, 2021Delhi High CourtInterDigital Technology Corporation and Ors v Xiaomi Corporation and Ors
United StatesApril 14, 2021District Court, Eastern District of TexasOptis Wireless Technology, LLC, v. Apple Inc., No. 2:19-CV-00066-JRG (E.D. Tex. 2021)
GermanyFebruary 25, 2021Regional Court of MunichRegional Court München, 25.02.2021, 7 O 14276/20 – Erstbegehungsgefahr bei Erlass einer Anti-Suit-Injunction
GermanyFebruary 12, 2021Higher Regional Court of KarlsruheHigher Regional Court Karlsruhe,12.02.2021, 6 U 130/20 – Wurzelsequenzordnung
United StatesJanuary 11, 2021District Court, Eastern District of TexasEricsson Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., No. 2:20-CV-00380-JRG (E.D. Tex. 2021)
IndiaDecember 16, 2020Delhi High CourtInterDigital Technology Corporation and Ors, InterDigital VC Holdings Inc and Ors v Xiaomi Corporation and Ors
GermanyDecember 9, 2020Higher Regional Court of KarlsruheHigher Regional Court Karlsuhe, 09.12.2020, 6 U 103/19 – Mobilstation
GermanyNovember 26, 2020Regional Court of DüsseldorfRegional court Düsseldorf, 26.11.2020, 4c O 17/19
GermanyNovember 24, 2020Federal Court of Justice (Bundesgerichtshof)Federal Court of Justice, 24.11.2020, KZR 35/17 – FRAND-Einwand II
BrazilNovember 20, 2020State of Rio de Janeiro Judiciary, Court of JusticeState of Rio de Janeiro Judiciary, Court of Justice, Common Procedure n. 0207683-04.2020.8.19.0001, Chief Judge: Paulo Assed Estefan, Judging Body: 4th Business Court, decided on November 20, 2020
ChinaSeptember 11, 2020Supreme People’s CourtConversant Wireless Licensing S.àr.l. v. Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. (2019) ZGFZMZ No. 732, 733, and 734(II), SPC
United KingdomAugust 26, 2020Supreme Court (UKSC)Unwired Planet v Huawei [2020] UKSC 37
GermanyAugust 18, 2020Regional Court of MannheimRegional court Mannheim, 18.08.2020, 2 O 34/19 – Lizenz in Wertschöpungskette
United StatesAugust 11, 2020Court of Appeals, Ninth CircuitFederal Trade Commission v. Qualcomm Inc., 969 F.3d 974 (9th Cir. 2020)
United StatesAugust 4, 2020Court of Appeals for the Federal CircuitGodo Kaisha IP Bridge 1 v. TCL Communication Technology Holdings Ltd., 967 F.3d 1380 (Fed. Cir. 2020)
GermanyMay 5, 2020Federal Court of Justice (Bundesgerichtshof)Federal Court of Justice, 05.05.2020, KZR 36/17 – FRAND-Einwand
United StatesDecember 5, 2019Court of Appeals for the Federal CircuitTCL Communication Technology Holdings Ltd. v. Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson, 943 F.3d 1360 (Fed. Cir. 2019)
United KingdomJuly 18, 2019Court of Appeal (EWCA)TQ Delta v ZyXEL [2019] EWCA Civ 1277
GermanyMarch 22, 2019Higher Regional Court of DüsseldorfHigher Regional Court Düsseldorf, 22.03.2019, 2 U 31/16 – Improving Handovers
JapanMarch 15, 2019Japan Fair Trade Commission2010(Han) No.1 (Japan Fair Trade Commission v Qualcomm)
United StatesMarch 13, 2019District Court, District of DelawareEvolved Wireless, LLC v. Apple Inc., No. 15-542-JFB-SRF (D. Del. 2019)
JapanMarch 4, 2019Intellectual Property High Court2018 (Ne) 10065 (Apple v Qualcomm)
United StatesFebruary 27, 2019District Court, District of New JerseyMondis Technology Ltd v. LG Electronics, Inc., 407 F. Supp. 3d 482 (D.N.J. 2019)
JapanFebruary 19, 2019Intellectual Property High Court2018 (Ne) 10048 (Apple v Qualcomm)
JapanDecember 12, 2018Intellectual Property High Court2018 (Ne) 10027 (Apple v Qualcomm)
United StatesSeptember 27, 2018District Court, Eastern District of TexasCore Wireless Licensing S.A.R.L. v. LG Electronics, Inc., No. 2:14-CV-00911-JRG, (E.D. Tex. 2018)
United StatesSeptember 25, 2018District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaHuawei Technologies, Co. v. Samsung Electronics Co., 340 F. Supp. 3d 934 (N.D. Cal. 2018)
United StatesAugust 16, 2018Court of Appeals for the Federal CircuitCore Wireless Licensing S.A.R.L. v. Apple Inc., 899 F.3d 1356 (Fed. Cir. 2019)
IndiaJuly 12, 2018Delhi High CourtKoninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. v Rajesh Bansal, Bhagirathi Electronics and Ors.
United StatesApril 13, 2018District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaHuawei Technologies, Co. v. Samsung Electronics Co, No. 3:16-cv-02787-WHO (N.D. Cal. 2018)
IndiaMarch 6, 2018Delhi High CourtDolby International AB and ANR v Das Telecom Private Limited and Ors
United StatesAugust 17, 2017Court of Appeals for the Federal CircuitJVC Kenwood Corp. v. Nero, Inc., 797 F.3d 1039 (Fed. Cir. 2015)
United KingdomMay 27, 2016Court of Appeal (EWCA)Samsung v Ericsson [2016] EWCA Civ 489
IndiaApril 22, 2016Delhi High CourtTelefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson v Xiaomi Technology and Ors
JapanDecember 24, 2015Intellectual Property High Court2015 (Ne) 10069 (SoftBank v Kanematsu)
United StatesDecember 3, 2015Court of Appeals for the Federal CircuitCommonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation v. Cisco Systems, Inc., 809 F.3d 1295 (Fed. Cir. 2015)
United StatesJuly 30, 2015Court of Appeals, Ninth CircuitMicrosoft Corp. v. Motorola, Inc., 795 F.3d 1024 (9th Cir. 2015)
CJEUMay 16, 2015Court of Justice of the European UnionCourt of Justice of the European Union (Fifth Chamber) [2015]: Huawei Technologies Co. Ltd v ZTE Corp. and ZTE Deutschland GmbH, Case No. C-170/13
IndiaMay 12, 2015Competition Commission of IndiaBest IT World (India) Private Limited (iBall) v Telefonaktiebolaget L M Ericsson
United StatesApril 27, 2015International Trade CommissionCertain 3G Mobile Handsets and Components Thereof, Inv. No. 337-TA-613 (Remand) (ITC Apr. 27, 2015)
JapanFebruary 18, 2015District Court of Tokyo2013 (Wa) 21383 (Imation Corporation v One-Blue)
IndiaDecember 8, 2014Delhi High CourtTelefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson v Xiaomi Technology and Ors
United StatesDecember 4, 2014Court of Appeals for the Federal CircuitEricsson, Inc. v. D-Link Systems, Inc., 773 F.3d 1201 (Fed. Cir. 2014)
United StatesJune 13, 2014International Trade CommissionCertain Wireless Devices With 3G and/or 4G Capabilities and Components Thereof, Inv. No. 337-TA-868 (ITC June 13, 2014)
JapanMay 16, 2014Intellectual Property High Court2013 (Ne) 10043 (Samsung v Apple)
JapanMay 16, 2014Intellectual Property High Court2013 (Ra) 10007 (Samsung v Apple)
United StatesApril 25, 2014Court of Appeals for the Federal CircuitApple Inc. v. Motorola, Inc., 757 F.3d 1286 (Fed. Cir. 2014)
IndiaJanuary 16, 2014Competition Commission of IndiaIntex Technologies (India) Limited v Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson
United StatesAugust 12, 2013District Court, Western District of WashingtonMicrosoft Corp. v. Motorola, Inc., 963 F. Supp. 2d 1176 (W.D. Wash. 2013)
United StatesJuly 26, 2013District Court, Northern District of IllinoisIn re Innovatio IP Ventures, LLC, Patent Litigation, 921 F. Supp. 2d 903 (N.D. Ill. 2013)
United StatesJuly 23, 2013Federal Trade CommissionIn re Motorola Mobility LLC and Google Inc., 156 F.T.C. 147 (2013)
United StatesJune 4, 2013International Trade CommissionCertain electronic devices, including wireless communication devices, portable music and data processing devices, and tablet computers, Inv. No. 337-TA-794 (ITC June 4, 2013)
United StatesMay 20, 2013District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaRealtek Semiconductor Corp. v. LSI Corp., 946 F. Supp. 2d 998 (N.D. Cal. 2013)
United StatesApril 25, 2013District Court, Western District of WashingtonMicrosoft Corp. v. Motorola, Inc., No. C10-1823JLR (W.D. Wash. 2013)
United StatesApril 23, 2013Federal Trade CommissionIn re Robert Bosch GmbH, 155 F.T.C. 713 (2013)
United StatesSeptember 28, 2012Court of Appeals, Ninth CircuitMicrosoft Corp. v. Motorola Inc., 696 F.3d 872 (9th Cir. 2012)
Republic of KoreaAugust 24, 2012Seoul Central District CourtSeoul Central District Court Decision, 2021Gahab39552, dated August 24, 2012
United StatesFebruary 27, 2012District Court, Western District of WashingtonMicrosoft Corp. v. Motorola, Inc., 854 F. Supp. 2d 993 (W.D. Wash. 2012)
United StatesMay 13, 2011Court of Appeals for the Federal CircuitHynix Semiconductor Inc. v. Rambus Inc., 645 F.3d 1336 (Fed. Cir. 2011)
United StatesSeptember 20, 2010Court of Appeals for the Federal CircuitFujitsu Ltd. v. Netgear Inc., 620 F.3d 1321 (Fed. Cir. 2010)
GermanyMay 6, 2009Federal Court of Justice (Bundesgerichtshof)Federal Court of Justice, 06.05.2009, KZR 39/06 – Orange-Book-Standard
United StatesApril 22, 2008Court of Appeals, District of Columbia CircuitRambus Inc. v. F.T.C., 522 F.3d 456 (D.C. Cir. 2008)
GermanyJuly 13, 2004Federal Court of Justice (Bundesgerichtshof)Federal Court of Justice, 13.07.2004, KZR 40/02 – Standard-Spundfass

Other decisions will get a separate blog post on their own and added to the Resources Tab.  Look at the jurisdiction specific resources to see the data.